German Bonds’ Worst Run Since 2012 Makes Inflation Data Critical

by Lucy Meakin/Bloomberg Business. –  A rekindling of the inflation outlook that helped trigger German government bonds’ worst weekly run since 2012 faces scrutiny next week with the release of final data on euro-area consumer prices for April.

Bonds across the euro-area fell this week, extending a slump that wiped as much as 344 billion euros ($393 billion) off the market capitalization of the Bloomberg Eurozone Sovereign Bond Index. That’s after the securities surged in the first quarter, when the European Central Bank began its bond-buying plan to support waning price growth in the region.

“We’ve definitely had a deflationary shock, you saw nominal government bond yields globally, especially in Europe, trade down to what have proven to be absurdly low levels,” Stephen Jones, the Edinburgh-based chief investment officer at Kames Capital, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “You come back to the core — noflation, which actually with modest growth and continued central bank support isn’t bad for asset markets.”

German 10-year bund yields rose eight basis points, or 0.08 percentage point, in the week, to 0.63 percent as of the 5 p.m. London close on Friday. The yield has surged from a record-low 0.049 percent on April 17. The 0.5 percent security due in February 2025 fell 0.73, or 7.30 euros per 1,000-euro face amount, to 98.825.

The four-week run of losses is the longest since June 2012, whenoptimism the euro area’s debt crisis was abating curbed demand for the haven of German sovereign securities.

Inflation Outlook

This time, the prospect of a recovery in inflation is helping fan turmoil in all the region’s debt markets, because quicker price growth erodes the spending power of fixed payments on bonds. The longest maturities have led declines, and the five-year, five-year forward inflation swap rate, a market metric identified by ECB President Mario Draghi as a benchmark for the inflation outlook, rose this week to the highest since November.

That’s throwing the spotlight back on the data. Consumer prices stagnated in the year through April, matching an initial estimate and ending a four-month run of declines, according to the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg before the May 19 data.

A second risk for bondholders from faster inflation would be any indication from the ECB that it would consider slowing the pace of its 60 billion euros a month of debt purchases. Central bank President Mario Draghi said in Washington on May 14 the central bank’s non-standard measures have so far proven to be “potent.” An account of policy makers’ April meeting is set to be published May 21.

As oil prices crater, hedge funds dive in Kate Kelly | @katekellycnbc 1 Hour Ago

Dan Bannister | Getty Images

As oil prices round out a month of trading in the $40 range, hedge funds in both the U.S. and abroad are grabbing at investment opportunities in a distressed energy sector.

In recent months, a spate of money managers, including Lansdowne Partners, Avenue Capital, Carlson Capital and Blackstone’s GSO Capital unit, have been raising fresh capital to deploy in either long-short energy stock picking, credit investing, or both. At the same time, hedge-fund investors say that finding ways to home in on the distressed oil industry has been a top priority of late.

Energy “is one of our top themes,” said Charlie Krusen, whose $200 million fund of funds company, Krusen Capital Management, has fielded dozens of pitches from hedge funds and private equity shops focusing on the troubled sector in recent months.

It’s all part of a stampede for returns at a time when energy companies’ cash-intensive drilling and servicing operations have been strained in the current, cheap-crude environment.

Read MoreNext for oil: Mergers, layoffs and ‘death spirals’

By snapping up shares of those companies in the stock market or their debt in the bond market, investors generally are making two types of bets: that the companies will recover ground when crude rises again, generating attractive returns for those who bought shares during the downturn, or, alternately, that the companies will go bankrupt if oil remains cheap—giving their bondholders a chance to swap existing bonds for equity and, effectively, take over troubled companies with compelling assets at fire-sale valuations.

“You haven’t had an industry this large become this distressed since the banking crisis,” said Jason Mudrick, manager of the $1.2 billion fund company Mudrick Capital, which is expanding its investing in energy at the moment. (Krusen’s company, for instance, plans to become an investor.)

The trick for investors is doing enough due diligence on corporate balance sheets and credit structures to know what they’re in for, while simultaneously finding the shale plays in the U.S. and beyond that are worth owning in the longer run.

Clint Carlson, whose $9 billion Carlson Capital in December announced the opening of three separate funds for trading energy stocks and bonds, believes that moving quickly will be critical.

Read MoreSasol choking on oil glut—holds $14B expansion

“What we’ve seen and we continue to see in the equity market is a lot of volatility in equity pricing, a lot of mispricing between companies that are doing the same things, [and] people not really understanding the impact of these capex cuts that are happening now,” Carlson said. Such tumult creates the opportunity for savvy stock pickers to generate returns, he added.

By contrast, Carlson said, the time to strike in the bond market is likely still two or three quarters away, at which point companies grappling with continued cheap crude prices would be in more severe distress.

The new energy investments are being funded by a mix of players. Some are traditional investors, like the fund of funds Krusen Capital or the Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System, the pension fund that recently invested $200 million in Avenue’s Energy Opportunities Fund, according to public filings.

Read MoreEight world-changing energy innovations

But wealthy individuals and corporations are also involved, the hedge fund managers said.

And distressed investing, whether in energy or another sector, is not without risk.

“It’s going to be very volatile,” said Marc Lasry, Avenue’s CEO, in a recent CNBC interview.

Cheap Oil’s Global GDP Boost Offset by Europe, Brazil Woes

By Andrew Mayeda Jan 9, 2015 9:17 AM ET

Plunging oil prices are giving a bump to consumer and business spending around the world — just not enough to increase global growth forecasts. A darkening outlook in emerging markets including China, Russia andBrazil and geopolitical risks such asGreece’s possible exit from the euro are overshadowing the benefits from lower energy costs. The median estimate for 2015 world expansion from economists surveyed by Bloomberg News has been unchanged since October, when it fell to 3.5 percent from 3.6 percent. “People are cautious in a world where they see other risks skewed to the downside,” said Bruce Kasman, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York. “There’s still a question mark out there.”

Oil Prices

Economists’ reluctance to boost estimates underscores the fragility of global growth after four straight years of below-forecast expansion. JPMorgan is a case in point: It estimates that sustained $60-a-barrel crude oil prices will add 0.5 percent to global gross domestic product, yet its Jan. 2 world expansion forecast of 2.9 percent for 2015 is down from a 3.3 percent estimate in July. The U.S., with a 3.2 percent expansion estimate, is the only one among the world’s 10 biggest economies that JPMorgan now sees growing more quickly than expected in July. The bank projects emerging markets will grow 3.9 percent this year, down from its July forecast of 4.9 percent, reflecting markdowns for nations including Russia, Brazil and India.

Global Stocks

Oil’s 55 percent decline since June, the steepest rout since the global financial crisis, has benefited haven assets such as U.S. Treasuries while depressing the currencies of crude exporters such asRussia. The MSCI All-Country World Index of stocks has dropped about 3.6 percent in the same period. Data released today highlighted the relative strength of the U.S. in the global economy. U.S. employment rose more than forecast in December and the jobless rate declined to 5.6 percent, capping the best year for the labor market since 1999. Meanwhile, Germany’s industrial production unexpectedly fell in November from the previous month as energy output slumped, while China’s factory-gate prices in December extended a record stretch of year-over-year declines with the sharpest drop since 2012.

Not ‘Manna’

Lower oil prices may not be the “manna from heaven” some forecasters are expecting, HSBC Holdings Plc economists Stephen King and Karen Ward said in a report Thursday. High levels of debt in developed nations are likely to blunt the benefits of monetary easing, while declines in oil and other commodities are straining emerging countries, they said. “The global economy was losing momentum and disinflation was building, meaning pricing power was being lost, before anything started to happen in the oil market,” Ward, who’s based in London, said in a phone interview. Federal Reserve officials last month saw a mixed bag in oil prices and the state of the global economy, according to minutes of their December meeting, released this week in Washington. While some policy makers said the drop in oil would have a positive impact on overseas employment and output, many officials “regarded the international situation as an important source of downside risks,” especially if oil’s decline and weak growth abroad affect financial markets, the minutes said. IMF Estimate The International Monetary Fund estimates that declining oil prices will increase global output by a range of 0.3 percent to 0.7 percent this year by boosting household incomes and lowering input costs for businesses, according to a blog post last month by chief economist Olivier Blanchard and Rabah Arezki, the head of the fund’s commodities research. Yet Blanchard and Arezki gave a disclaimer in their blog, saying that the estimates of the impact from oil’s drop don’t “represent a forecast for the state of the world economy in 2015 and beyond.” The IMF will release an update to its World Economic Outlook later this month. The fund’s last forecast in October was for global expansion of 3.8 percent this year, down from a 4 percent estimate given in July. If low oil prices persist for years, that could herald a prolonged boom in the global economy, saidEric Green, head of U.S. economic research at TD Securities USA LLC in New York.

Avoiding Flareups

“Provided Europe doesn’t go back into recession or you don’t have some flareup of massive geopolitical risk or some financial issue, you are going to see global forecasts revised incrementally higher,” Green said in a phone interview.
Much will depend on whether the drop is driven by excess supply or softening global demand. The IMF estimates weak demand accounts for as little as 20 percent of oil’s decline. The more that’s a force, the less the world economy will benefit from lower crude prices, according to the Washington-based lender. “If the drop in oil prices were only a supply shock, you’d most likely see a relatively strong boost to global growth,” said Gregory Daco, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics USA in New York. “Some of the weakness in oil prices is being driven by relatively modest global demand, which is why you’re not seeing in your surveys many outright increases in global growth.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Mayeda in Ottawa at amayeda@bloomberg.net To contact the editors responsible for this story: Chris Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net Scott Lanman, Brendan Murray

7/2014 Hedge funds under threat from pension fund rethink | Reuters

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/07/uk-hedgefunds-investment-idUSKBN0IR14X20141107 1/5
BY NISHANT KUMAR, SIMON JESSOP AND ANTHONY DEUTSCH
LONDON Fri Nov 7, 2014 7:25am EST

(Reuters) – Pension schemes are starting to rethink their hedge
fund investments in the face of high costs and poor returns,
putting at risk the heady pace of capital flows into an industry
with nearly $3 trillion of assets.
Investors pulled more than $15 billion from hedge funds in the
September quarter, industry data showed, ending six quarters of
net inflows. Investments from large institutions such as pension
funds contribute about 63 percent of hedge fund capital,
according to industry tracker Preqin.
Pension funds are turning to cheaper, more transparent and
liquid products mimicking hedge fund strategies, as well as so
called ‘smart beta’ funds, which aim to capture a part of a hedge
fund strategy’s returns at a fraction of the cost.
For some, such as 63-year-old Dutch pensioner Jelle van der
Linde, the switch has come too late.
Van der Linde has seen his benefits cut by more than six percent
since last year, partly because of the high investment fees his
metalworkers and engineers pension fund, PMT, paid.
“I would have been better off putting it
into an old sock. I would at least have had more than I do now,” he said.
At less than 2 percent of PMT’s $70 billion assets, its hedge fund bets accounted for nearly a
third of its total expenses, according to a statement by the pension fund in September, in
which PMT said the slight benefits from spreading its risks were insufficient.
PMT and others such as the $296 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System
(Calpers) and Britain’s Local Pensions Fund Authority (LPFA) with assets of 4.8 billion
pounds($7.6 billion), are among those who have already ditched hedge funds this year.
Several others, including Britain’s 20 billion pound ($32 billion) Railway Pension Scheme
and San Francisco’s city pension fund are reassessing their hedge fund allocations.
“In terms of hedge funds, overall, we are sceptical about the value for money they provide
for us as a pension fund,” Susan Martin, LPFA’s chief executive, told Reuters.
“The lack of transparency and high fee structure is not aligned with the interest of asset
owners such as ourselves,” said Martin, whose firm removed one of Europe’s largest hedge
funds, Brevan Howard, from its portfolios earlier this year.
In a survey of institutional investors released on Friday, Ernst & Young said that only 13
percent of the respondents said they planned to raise bets on hedge funds in the next three
years, down from 20 percent in 2012 and 17 percent in 2013.
Recent volatility in stock and currency markets could help hedge funds to attract
investment given their expertise in managing downside risk, but average performance of
funds in recent years has been weak.
Of the 51 negative months recorded by the MSCI World index over the last decade, hedge
funds – which aim to make money in both rising and falling markets – have on average lost
money in 36 months, the Eurekahedge Hedge Fund Index shows.
Of the 69 positive months recorded by the index, equity hedge funds have lagged on 57
occasions.
CALPERS SHOCK
Calpers, the largest U.S. pension fund, said in September that it would pull all $4 billion it
had invested in hedge funds such as Och-Ziff Capital Management and Metacapital
because it found them costly and complicated.
A typical cost structure for a hedge fund is an annual 2 percent of the value of assets as a
management fee plus 20 percent of any profits, although big clients can negotiate.
The cost of ‘smart beta’ funds, which capture part of an actively managed strategy, say by
buying and selling merger candidates at a set point in the deal, can be less than 1 percent.
European mutual funds now also offer hedge-fund-like strategies – so-called ‘liquid
alternatives’, which allow investors to get money out quicker than a normal hedge fund – for
a management fee as low as 1 percent and a lower performance fee. U.S. peers, meanwhile,
charge no performance fee.
Liquid alternatives can also be sold to retail investors – opening up a source of capital for
both mutual and hedge funds that launch their own versions.
Investments in liquid alternatives are expected to grow about 44 percent in 2015 according
to a Deutsche Bank survey of almost 300 hedge fund managers and investors. Traditional
hedge funds have grown about 13 percent annually since the financial crisis..
The New Zealand Super Fund, a government superannuation savings vehicle which
terminated some of its hedge fund investments this year, is building a team to manage
money in-house, as is the LPFA.
At the LPFA, roughly a tenth of its 5 billion pounds in assets are now managed in-house
from zero two years ago, helping it save 3.5 million pounds in annual fees. Calpers paid
$135 million in fees for its exposure to hedge funds last year.
“Building in-house expertise is a way to get better returns, to manage our liabilities and
ensure that we have cash available when we need it to pay our pensioners,” Martin of LPFA
said.
Some hedge funds have begun to respond to the threat to their business by becoming more
like asset managers; lowering costs and diversifying their products in similar ways. Others
are looking to attract alternative investors, such as the rich individuals who formed the precrisis
industry backbone.
Meanwhile, top performing funds, even at the highest fee levels, will continue to attract
capital, although many of them are closed to new money.
Jack Inglis, chief executive of industry body Alternative Investment Management
Association said that the equities boom will not last forever and investors will contiunue
buying for capital preservation, diversification and reduced volatility.
“Individual pension fund investors in hedge funds may come and go, but the case for
including hedge funds in institutional investor portfolios has never been stronger,” he said.

(Additional reporting by Anthony Deutsch in Amsterdam; Editing by Alexander Smith and
Elaine Hardcastle)

Scottish vote may spook markets: Major asset manager Nyshka Chandran | @NyshkaC 16 Hours Ago CNBC.com

The CEO of one of Europe’s biggest asset managers has warned that markets will undoubtedly face a tough day on Friday as news of the outcome of the Scottish independence vote reaches investors.

Martin Gilbert, the CEO of Aberdeen Asset Management, rejected the notion of any permanent declines for the pound in an interview with CNBC however, anticipating just a day of dislocation before the currency rebounds.

He does not believe that capital will flee the U.K. if Scots vote to break away.

Read MoreUK opposes Scottish exit amid bank run fears

“It will certainly surprise the markets, I think, if there is a yes vote. They are not really prepared for it. I mean, no one has really prepared, has any contingency plans in place,” Gilbert said.

According to the latest poll by the Scottish Daily Mail, 52 percent favor staying in the United Kingdom while 48 percent support leaving. Around 8 percent of eligible voters remain undecided and hold the key to the outcome.

Gilbert is an advocate of sterlingization – the adoption of the pound without the backing of the Bank of England (BoE). But BoE central bank governor Mark Carney warned that such a move would not be compatible with political sovereignty and would require the employment of similar economic policies such as current account surpluses.

“I think it’s actually quite good discipline to have sterlingization. I do agree with [Carney]. It’s almost like a halfway house. But it actually puts a discipline on Scotland if we did have it, which I think would be good. You can’t just become a nation that spends. I think I see his point but I do also think it would be good for Scotland,” said Gilbert.

Read MoreIf Scotland votes ‘yes’, these places might be next

Gilbert doesn’t imagine the BoE remaining a lender of last resort. “That’s why I think we will see all the banks moving their headquarters south. That’s not such a big thing because most of them are already headquartered or quasi-headquartered in London.”

He also dismissed suggestions that a ‘Yes’ vote would greatly harm the economy: “A lot of [those calls have] been exaggerated. We are in an election campaign so we’ve got to take what’s said on both sides with a reasonable amount of cynicism.”

Martin Gilbert, Chief Executive of Aberdeen Asset Management.

Getty Images
Martin Gilbert, Chief Executive of Aberdeen Asset Management.

“What we’ve done as a business is try to remain absolutely neutral… we think Scotland can thrive if it’s a Yes vote or a No vote,” Gilbert said.

Despite leading an Aberdeen-based firm with roughly £322 billion in assets, the Scotsman said the firm would not move its headquarters to London if the ‘Yes’ camp triumphs.

Read MoreWhy Scottish nationalists’ wager on energy is risky

“We are not like a bank with assets on our balance sheet. I think why the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Bank of England suggested to banks that they should relocate was to stop a run on the deposits if it were to be a ‘Yes’ vote,” he said.

Scotland-based businesses including Lloyds and the Royal Bank of Scotland already announced that they would move their headquarters to London in the case of independence.